<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Killian Branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.killianbranding.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.killianbranding.com</link>
	<description>Adapt. Evolve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:46:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Envelopes = death.</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/envelopes-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/envelopes-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[envelopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-mailer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have been advising clients for many years now not to put brochures into envelopes, as a large and growing percentage of them get thrown away unopened.
Frankly, we&#8217;ve been telling clients not to put anything into snail mail at all, but that&#8217;s not an absolute rule.
I just retrieved an envelope from the garbage to prove [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We have been advising clients for many years now not to put brochures into envelopes</strong>, as a large and growing percentage of them get thrown away unopened.</p>
<p>Frankly, we&#8217;ve been telling clients not to put <em>anything</em> into snail mail at all, but that&#8217;s not an absolute rule.</p>
<p>I just retrieved an envelope from the garbage to prove the point. It was plain, with only a logo from a high-end appliance retailer (which I won&#8217;t name, as that might be apt to hurt someone&#8217;s feelings). Inside was an sales catalog, with some attractive pricing on hundreds of items. One could envision blanking out part of an outside panel to make it into a self-mailer with a wafer seal, letting it arrive minus the trash-me-now envelope. Would it be a wonderful piece? Maybe or maybe not, but drawing immediate attention to the 80-inch plasma tvs or Weber gas grills or KitchenAid doodads would be an inducement to break the seal and read further. The ROI of unopened deathvelopes is dismal.</p>
<p>Do you know a company (or non-profit, for that matter) who still use envelopes? Send them a link to this blog post, along with a polite note to remind them that the 1980s were a long time ago&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/envelopes-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammar police? Yes, we are.</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/grammar-police-yes-we-are/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/grammar-police-yes-we-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Your Résumé vs. Oblivion" cover letters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We take some heat for rejecting employment candidates whose résumés and cover letters fail to measure up to our grammar/spelling/usage standards. We do not apologize; we were born this way. Besides, our standards have to be high, because we work for clients who expect it.

Our emphasis on cover letters is not at all misplaced. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We take some heat for rejecting employment candidates whose résumés and cover letters fail to measure up to our grammar/spelling/usage standards. We do not apologize; we were born this way. Besides, our standards have to be high, because we work for clients who expect it.</p>

<p>Our emphasis on <a href="http://www.killianbranding.com/cover-letters-from-hell/" title="Cover Letters">cover letters</a> is not at all misplaced. It&#8217;s the one chance a jobseeker has to stand out from the herd. Since one&#8217;s résumé, as noted in a recent <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204624204577178941034941330.html?mod=WSJ_article_comments#articleTabs%3Darticle" title="Your résumé ve. oblivion">WSJ article</a>, is routinely screened by robots, it must now be composed by robots in an escalating duel of software gamesmanship. The resulting document is a vanilla collection of facts designed for OCR, studded with keywords culled from the job description. Useful, yes, but not differentiating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/grammar-police-yes-we-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your website a destination or a conduit?</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/is-your-website-a-destination-or-a-conduit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/is-your-website-a-destination-or-a-conduit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[original content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hulu and Netflix are both investing hundreds of millions of dollars into original programming, instead of being just a conduit for content. The value of mere distribution is shrinking everywhere – it&#8217;s not a great time to be a wholesaler.
Relevant question for your brand: can search engine robots find original content on your website?
It&#8217;s not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hulu and Netflix are both investing hundreds of millions of dollars into original programming, instead of being just a conduit for content. The value of mere distribution is shrinking everywhere – it&#8217;s not a great time to be a wholesaler.</p>
<P>Relevant question for your brand: can search engine robots find original content on your website?</P>
<p>It&#8217;s not a trivial matter, since <strong>truly original content is the single biggest factor you can control</strong> to become more visible on Search Engine Results Pages (SERP). Unfortunately, there are hundreds of thousands of cookie-cutter sites, especially smaller businesses victimized by the lowball sales pitch of &#8220;specialists&#8221; in their category. The price seems like a bargain, but the buyer never realizes that the copy they publish in Waukegan gets recycled in Wilmington and Walla-Walla. Human site visitors never notice, but the search engines downgrade the unsuspecting realtor/orthodontist/financial guru who wonders why his competitor is kicking his butt on Google.</p>
<p>Hey. If you&#8217;ve got your hands full being a doctor/restaurant/shopping mall, blogging and tweeting original content may not be a core competency, or even interesting to you. But it&#8217;s fascinating to robots, so you should stongly consider outsourcing. <strong>Content curation</strong> is a very hot discipline, and often a great investment. Ask us about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/is-your-website-a-destination-or-a-conduit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Describe your prospect.</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/describe-your-prospect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/describe-your-prospect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not as easy as it seems.
I ask about your prospects, you describe your customers.

Perfectly understandable. Brand stakeholders, from assistant brand managers up to the CEO, know customers. Survey them. Talk to them. Play golf with them. From there, it&#8217;s often an easy (lazy?) assumption that prospects are the same sort of folks, just unaware.Unenlightened. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not as easy as it seems.</p>
<p><strong>I ask about your prospects, you describe your customers.</strong></p>

<p>Perfectly understandable. Brand stakeholders, from assistant brand managers up to the CEO, know customers. Survey them. Talk to them. Play golf with them. From there, it&#8217;s often an easy (lazy?) assumption that prospects are the same sort of folks, just unaware.Unenlightened. As a result, communications get focused on the identical demographics, psychographics and geography. It&#8217;s another example of <a href="http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/mbwt-enemy-of-branding/" title="MBWT, enemy of branding">MBWT</a>, Marketing By Wishful Thinking.</p>
<p>But prospects must be different from customers (duh!) and knowing what it is that keeps them from choosing you is essential. Why? You can grow your business incrementally (say, 6%) by satisfying customers, but the only way to grow your business exponentially (say, 200%) is by capturing new customers. We can show you how to identify new market segments, focus on the needs of prospects in your messaging, while allowing product satisfaction to retain customers. Is it time to rethink assumptions, perhaps beginning with some actionable research?</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/describe-your-prospect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your brand&#8217;s credibility formula</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/your-brands-credibility-formula/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/your-brands-credibility-formula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your brand&#8217;s credibility can be measured mathematically, by a simple equation:
C = 100%/a

where C is credibility, and a is the number of attributes that define your brand, such as low price, selection, service, unique functionality, high quality, and so on. Make yourself a list.

Thus, Volvo, who is all about safety has street cred = 100%. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your brand&#8217;s credibility can be measured mathematically, by a simple equation:</p>
<p><strong>C = 100%/a</strong></p>

<p>where <strong>C</strong> is credibility, and <strong>a</strong> is the number of attributes that define your brand, such as low price, selection, service, unique functionality, high quality, and so on. Make yourself a list.</p>

<p>Thus, Volvo, who is all about safety has street cred = 100%. L&#8217;Oreal, all about high quality, 100%. Sears, which is about selection and price and appliances and tools and history = 100%/5, thus 20% believable.</p>

<p>There&#8217;s a local car dealer on tv in your (or any given) market who claims to be about selection, price, service, dependability, convenient hours and location, cash back, free coffee, monster tent events, and a maniacal toothy grin. He&#8217;ll give you ten reasons why you should visit, and the cred % shrinks with every message.</p>

<p><strong>Can you discipline your brand to about one important attribute?</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/your-brands-credibility-formula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want the simple secret to branding success?</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/want-the-simple-secret-to-branding-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/want-the-simple-secret-to-branding-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever notice how many teaser headlines, particularly in online display ads, invoke the words &#8220;trick,&#8221; &#8220;secret,&#8221; or &#8220;simple&#8221;?
The simple secret to branding success, of course, does not exist. Nor, may I add, is there a &#8220;trick&#8221; to elections, religion, weight loss, home buying, marriage, public policy, child raising, mental health, investing, budgeting, radioactive waste, conflict [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever notice how many teaser headlines, particularly in online display ads, invoke the words &#8220;trick,&#8221; &#8220;secret,&#8221; or &#8220;simple&#8221;?</p>
<p><strong>The simple secret to branding success, of course, does not exist.</strong> Nor, may I add, is there a &#8220;trick&#8221; to elections, religion, weight loss, home buying, marriage, public policy, child raising, mental health, investing, budgeting, radioactive waste, conflict resolution or wine pairings.</p>

<p>No human problem more complex than which way to tighten or loosen a light bulb can be solved with a pithy formula. There are, of course, no shortage of buy-my-book soothsayers willing to persuade us otherwise – there is marketing gold there. One way to sell stuff or create converts or solicit votes is to appeal to the allure of sweet simplicity, delivered without hesitation or doubt.</p>

<p>The implications for branding are clear enough. Life is messy, and decisions are often complex and nuanced. To begin the dialog, however, a brand should offer one kind of simplicity: it has to stand for something. One thing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/want-the-simple-secret-to-branding-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MBWT, enemy of branding</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/mbwt-enemy-of-branding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/mbwt-enemy-of-branding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MBWT is a crippling disease of branding: Marketing By Wishful Thinking.

MBWT strikes brands large and small, old and new. You see the symptoms everywhere: the urge to stand for more than one thing, the assumption that if you say it they will hear it, the stupider assumption that if they hear it they will believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MBWT </strong>is a crippling disease of branding:<strong> Marketing By Wishful Thinking.</strong></p>

<p>MBWT strikes brands large and small, old and new. You see the symptoms everywhere: the urge to stand for more than one thing, the assumption that if you say it they will hear it, the stupider assumption that if they hear it they will believe it. Wishful thinking fuels the belief that old media choices still work today … and on and on.</p>
<p>We want to believe what we want to believe. Natural as breathing.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s needed is a dose of salts, as they used to say. A healthy skepticism about what the brand really means, who the prospects really are, what they really need, what the competitive environment is today – a kind of zero-based reboot of assumptions about goals, processes, channels, messaging, capabilities. </p> 
<p> MBWT is easy, but that re-examination is hard. Deal with it. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/mbwt-enemy-of-branding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What audience should you ignore?</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/what-audience-should-you-ignore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/what-audience-should-you-ignore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brand can only stand out if it stands up and stands for something.

Some one thing, ideally. It&#8217;s perfectly clear what Tiffany&#8217;s, Volvo, Will Ferrell movies and Las Vegas stand for – you have obvious expectations of any consistent brand. There are audience segments perfectly attuned to respond to their messages.

The logical corollary is that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A brand can only stand out if it stands up and stands for something.</strong></p>

<p>Some <em>one</em> thing, ideally. It&#8217;s perfectly clear what Tiffany&#8217;s, Volvo, Will Ferrell movies and Las Vegas stand for – you have obvious expectations of any consistent brand. There are audience segments perfectly attuned to respond to their messages.</p>

<p>The logical corollary is that there are market segments that must be ignored. You should identify them as clearly as you do your sweet spot. That is to say, you must fiercely resist the temptation to &#8220;round out&#8221; your offerings to appeal to a broader and broader audience, fuzzing the edges until nobody understands what you stand for. Rolls-Royce does not go on sale. WalMart does not have valet parking. Renzo Piano does not design bungalows.</p>

<p>Having &#8220;something for everyone&#8221; is a symptom of <a href="http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/mbwt-enemy-of-branding/" title="MBWT, enemy of branding">MBWT</a>, Marketing By Wishful Thinking. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/what-audience-should-you-ignore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our interns keep getting hired</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/our-interns-keep-getting-hired/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/our-interns-keep-getting-hired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we&#8217;re looking once again for ambitious, client-happiness-directed entry-level future stars to learn the branding agency business. It seems the economy is warming up. They&#8217;ll need excellent communications skills, of course. If you know good candidates, forward this to them; have them send résumés asap to internships@killianbranding.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we&#8217;re looking once again for ambitious, client-happiness-directed entry-level future stars to learn the branding agency business. It seems the economy is warming up. They&#8217;ll need excellent communications skills, of course. If you know good candidates, forward this to them; have them send résumés asap to internships@killianbranding.com.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/our-interns-keep-getting-hired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping up with the tour group?</title>
		<link>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/keeping-up-with-the-tour-group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/keeping-up-with-the-tour-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BrandAids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.killianbranding.com/?p=3778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The universe is evolving1. The world is evolving2. Life on earth is evolving3. Society is evolving4. Your business is evolving5.

1The universe was 14.7 billion years old last Thursday, and expansion keeps accelerating.
2Tectonic plates are still in motion.
3More than 99% of all the species that ever lived are now extinct.
4Slavery was acceptable; now it&#8217;s not. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The universe is evolving<sup>1</sup>. The world is evolving<sup>2</sup>. Life on earth is evolving<sup>3</sup>. Society is evolving<sup>4</sup>. Your business is evolving<sup>5</sup>.</strong></p>

<em><p><sup>1</sup>The universe was 14.7 billion years old last Thursday, and expansion keeps accelerating.</p>
<p><sup>2</sup>Tectonic plates are still in motion.</p>
<p><sup>3</sup>More than 99% of all the species that ever lived are now extinct.</p>
<p><sup>4</sup>Slavery was acceptable; now it&#8217;s not. The same is true for witch burnings, the Whig Party, colonialism and the Macarena.</p>
<p><sup>5</sup>Constant change demands <a href="http://www.killianbranding.com/whitepapers/adaptation/" title="Adaptation">adaptation</a>, the key to your brand&#8217;s survival.</p></em>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.killianbranding.com/blog/keeping-up-with-the-tour-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.619 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-05 12:50:38 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
